FIROZ AHMAD ANSARI @ DEEPAK KUMAR @ FIROZ ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./8202/2026 · 2026-09-03
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25063 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25063 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:26622] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.8202 of 2026
------ Firoz Ahmad Ansari @ Deepak Kumar, @ Firoz Ansari, aged about 35 years, Son of Reyaj Ahmad, resident of Village- Doranda, Mani Tola, Nizam Nagar, P.O. + P.S.- Doranda, District- Ranchi. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Prathik, Advocate
Mr. Anil Kumar Choudhary, Advocate. For the State
: Mr. Satish Kumar Keshri, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-02 Dated:-03-09-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Raidih P.S. Case No. 11 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2), 318(4) & 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner and his wife has cheated the informant by taking Rs.2,56,000/- for arranging a job for the informant in Secretariat at Ranchi. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that there is no allegation of money having been transferred to the account of the petitioner and all the payment of money as is alleged to have been made by On-line mode. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 30.05.2026 as mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the charge-sheet has been submitted. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for
bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gumla in connection with Raidih P.S. Case No. 11 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 03.09.2026 Amar/