B.Madan Mohan Reddy, S/o. Late B.Venkataiah v. The Superintending Engineer
WP/33850/2013 · 2026-01-28
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25058 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25058 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010532492013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 33850/2013 Between:
1. B.MADAN MOHAN REDDY, S/O. LATE B.VENKATAIAH, UNEMPLOYEE, R/O.KONAPURAM, PENUKONDA MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OPERATION, CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LIMITED, ANANTAPUR.
2. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LIMITED, REDHILLS, HYDERABAD.
3. THE CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A P LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, HYDERABAD.
4. THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, A.P. TRANSCO, HYDERABAD.
5. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENERGY DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD.
...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D BALA KISHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. P LAKSHMA REDDY
2. Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC FOR APSPDCL The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:-
The Learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the petition is filed for appointment under compassionate terms and the petitioner has challenged memo dated 16.08.2007 issued by the 2nd respondent and memo dated 14.09.2007 issued by the 1st respondent as illegal and arbitrary. It is further submitted that the said memos are coming in the way of the respondents appointing the petitioner on compassionate terms.
2. The learned Standing Counsel further submits that the respondents have taken a policy decision and approved appointment of over-aged and under-aged dependants of the deceased on a one-time basis and accordingly, the petitioner was appointed as Office Subordinate vide memo dated
19.01.2024.
3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed, as the grievance of the petitioner has been adequately addressed by the respondents. No order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
Date.29.01.2026 SR