Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25057 (JHR)

NEHA KUMAR @ MEJA DEVI @ NEHA KUMARI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./4975/2026 · 2026-09-02

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:26459 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 4975 of 2026 Neha Kumar @ Neha Devi @ Neha Kumari, daughter of Mahendra Kumar, wife of Santosh Kumar, aged about 24 years, resident of village Edla, P.O. Edla, P.S. Simariya, District-Chatra ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Prashant Kr. Rahul, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, A.P.P. 02/ 02.09.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Simariya P.S. Case No. 219 of 2022, registered under sections 363, 366A of the I.P.C and sections 4 and 6 of POCSO Act, pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Spl. Judge POCSO, Chatra. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the F.I.R has been lodged in the year, 2022 and now the petitioner has received notice under section 35(3) of BNSS, 2023. He next submits that there is nothing against the petitioner and if any mischief has been done that has been done by her husband namely, Santosh Kumar. In this background, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application with liberty to move before the learned court by way of filing appropriate petition. 4. Learned counsel for the State has got no objection. 5. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Dt.02.09.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-