Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25049 (AP)

THAMMISETTY BODAIAH v. SHRI DR S VENKATESWAR IAS

CC/2887/2025 · 2026-01-30

T C D Sekhar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010533312025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] SATURDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2887/2025 Between: 1. THAMMISETTY BODAIAH, S/O T. VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 6-140, ISAKAMITTA VILLAGE, SULLURUPETA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SHRI DR S VENKATESWAR IAS, District Collector, Tirupati, Tirupati District. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondent under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for his willful and deliberate disobedience of the orders passed by the Honble High Court in W.P.No.41223 of 2022, dated 02.04.2025 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to dispense with my appearance on 23-01-2026 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Y MAHA LAKSHMI Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. J DILEEP KUMAR The Court made the following order: When the matter is taken up for hearing, the counsel for the respondent submitted that, the order under contempt is complied with and the respondent has issued proceedings dated 21.01.2026, through which the subject land i.e., an extent of Ac.3.50 cents in Sy.No.310/3P2 of Poolathota Village, Doravarisatram Mandal, Nellore district, had been directed to delete from the prohibited properties list issued under Section 22(A) of the Registration Act, 1908. The counsel would further submit that, in pursuance of the said direction given by the District Collector, the subject property had been deleted from the prohibited list by the Registrar concerned. The said submission made by the counsel for the respondent is not disputed by the counsel for the petitioner. 2. In such circumstances, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the present contempt case, inasmuch as the order under contempt is complied with and accordingly the same is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR Dt.31.01.2026 DSB 6 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR CC No.2887of 2025 Date 31.01.2026 U DSB