IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7230 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-338 Year-2025 Thana- RAJIVNAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== 1. Bharat Prasad Son of Late Ramaswarath Rai R/o Village - Ramjichak, P.S. - Digha, Dist. - Patna. 2. Chandan Kumar Son of Arun Rai R/o Village - Ramjichak, P.S. - Digha, Dist. - Patna. 3. Ranjan Kumar Son of Ram Sushil Prasad R/o Village - Ramjichak, P.S. - Digha, Dist. - Patna. 4. Manoj Kumar Son of Late Ram Sushil Prasad R/o Village - Ramjichak, P.S. - Digha, Dist. - Patna. 5. Rai Vijay Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar @ Mujesh Kumar Son of Lalji Rai R/o Village - Ramjichak, P.S. - Digha, Dist. - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Roshan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 13-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case, registered for offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 324(4), 303(2), 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. 3. Allegation against petitioners is that they demolished the boundary wall of informant and also snatched Rs. 10,000/- from the pocket of informant. They also forcibly evicted the labourers working at the site. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7230 of 2026(3) dt.13-07-2026 2/2 4. From perusal of paragraph – 2 of the supplementary affidavit, filed on behalf of petitioners, it appears that petitioner nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5 have got one criminal antecedent, whereas petitioner no. 2 has got two criminal antecedent. 5. Considering the nature of accusation, criminal antecedent and material, which has come during course of investigation, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners is rejected. anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T