Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25045 (AP)

Abbigari Vengaiah v. Rajiv Vidya Mission (SSA)

WP/22740/2013 · 2026-03-04

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010532482013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 22740/2013 Between: 1. ABBIGARI VENGAIAH,, S/O SRI RAMULU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC: INCLUSIVE EDUCATION RESOURCE TEACHER, MANDAL RESOURCE CENTRE, RAILWAY KAKIS MANDAL, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. BALARAJUGARI VIJAYA KUMARI,, D/O VENGALA RAJU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 35 JESTS, OCC: INCLUSIVE EDUCATION RESOURCE TEACHER, VANTIMITTA MANDAL RESOURCE CENTRE, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA. 3. M. RAMANJUL REDDY, S/O. MAL REDDY REDDEPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS OCC: RESOURCE TEACHER, VEMULA MANDAL RESOURCE CENTRE, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA. 4. YELLATURI VIJAYA LAKSHMI, D/O Y.RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC: RESOURCE TEACHER, PULIVENDULA MANDAL RESOURCE CENTRE, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. RAJIV VIDYA MISSION SSA, REP. BY ITS STATE PROJECT DIRECTOR, ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE PROJECT OFFICER, RAJIV VIDYA MISSION (SSA), Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA. 2 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, Y.S.R KADAPA, DISTRICT, KADAPA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or dreetkin, more particularly a Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the 1st respondent in issuing the notification dated 29.06.2013 while the petitioners are working as per the proceedings Re.No.906/A5/IERT/RVM (SSA)/2013 dated 01.06.2013 of the 3rd respondent as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently Arm doe respondents to continue the services of the petitioners in their respective posts and to grant IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 27878 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the services of the petitioners as Inclusive Education Resource Teachers pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To vacate the interim orders. Dt;31-07-2013 in WPMP.No.27878/2013 in WP.No.22740/2013 and dismiss the writ petition No.22740 of 2017 in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to amend the prayer after the word 3rd respondent and before the word as illegal "so far as showing the petitioners appointment as against the MR Vacancy" in the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. REVANURU SUDHA RANI (SC FOR SAMAGRA SHIKSHA) 3 2. VAKA KRANTHI SRI The Court made the following: 4 Order:- This writ petition was filed declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing the notification dated 29.06.2013 while the petitioners are working as per the proceedings Re.No.906/A5/IERT/RVM (SSA)/2013 dated 01.06.2013 of the 3rd respondent, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the grievance of the petitioners has been adequately addressed by the respondents. 3. Recording the same, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 05.03.2026 SR