APHC010540572024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] WEDNESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 767/2024 Between: 1.RAVILLA GURRAPPA NAIDU(DIED), BY L.RS. 2.SMT.R.JAYAMMA,, W/O LATE RAVILLA GURRAPPA NAIDU, HOUSE WIFE, AGED 64 YEARS, MADIBAKA VILLAGE AND POST, YERPEDU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3.R.ANAND,, S/O LATE RAVILLA GURRAPPA NAIDU, OCC.PRIVATE EMPLOYE, AGED 45 YEARS, MADIBAKA VILLAGE AND POST, YERPEDU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1.PALADUGU KUSUMA KUMARI, W/O MUNIRATHNAM NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT KASTHURI KANDRIGA, PANAKAM POST, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL,CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2.R NAGESWARA RAO, S/O LATE RAVILLA GURRAPPA NAIDU, BUSINESS, AGED 47 YEARS, MADIBAKA VILLAGE AND POST, YERPEDU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal under section ___________ against orderspleased to allow the Second Appeal by setting aside the Judgment and Decree passed in A.S.No.167 of 2023 on the file XII Additional District Judge, Srikalahasti, Chittoor District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to condone the delay of (306) days in filing the above S.A. filed against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.167 of 2023, dated 12.10.2023 on the file of XII Additional District Judge, SrikalahastI and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of the Judgement and decree in O.S.No. 133 of 2017 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Srikalahasti and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1.MADHU SUDHAN P Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.PAWAN KUMAR MALAPATI The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of both parties were present. 2. Learned counsel appearing on both sides submitted that both the parties were compromised and the matter has been settled out of the Court between both the parties and learned counsel for the appellants submitted that they want to withdrawn the present appeal. 3. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on both sides, the Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date: 04.02.2026 CVD