Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31148 MFA No. 5699 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5699 OF 2022 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
SMT.MANJULABAI BEDAKEKAR @ NAGALAKSHMI D/O M.G.KRISHNOJI RAO W/O DR B SURESH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS NO.532/A, 5TH CROSS, 4TH MAIN SSA ROAD, HEBBAL BENGALURU - 560 024 …APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SHANKAR M R., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1.
SRI.NAGULAL RAO S/O M G KRISHNOJI RAO AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS NO.274/349, OPPOSITE TO PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE NAGAWARA MAIN ROAD KADUGONDANAHALLI BENGALURU - 560 045
2.
SRI KRISHNOJIRAO S/O LATE GIRIMOJI RAO AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS NO. 274/349, OPPOSITE TO PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE
Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31148 MFA No. 5699 of 2022
NAGAWARA MAIN ROAD KADUGONDANAHALLI BENGALURU - 560 045
3.
SRI P C THAMBI AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS SIDDARAMAIAH GARDEN ST.THOMAS TOWN BENGALURU - 560 084
4. SMT.SOSAMMA W/O P C THAMBI AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS SIDDARAMAIAH GARDEN ST.THOMAS TOWN BENGALURU - 560 084
5.
SRI SANTHOSH KUMAR S/O P C THAMBI AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS SIDDARAMAIAH GARDEN ST.THOMAS TOWN BENGALURU - 560084 …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.VIKHAR AHMED B.,ADVOCATE FOR R-1;
SRI.KRISHNOJI RAO., SERVED AMD UNREPRESENTED;
NOTICE TO R3 TO R5 IS DISPENSED WITH V/O/D 17.08.2022)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S 43 RULE 1(C) OF CPC., TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 09.06.2022 PASSED BY THE VII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER ORDER 9 RULE 9 R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31148 MFA No. 5699 of 2022
ORAL JUDGMENT
There is no representation on behalf of the appellant.
2.
Learned counsel for respondent No.1 is present.
3. In view of absence of counsel for the appellant even on the previous date of hearing, it appears that the appellant is not interested in proceeding further with the matter.
4. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution.
Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE
VM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34