- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31790-DB RP No. 537 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REVIEW PETITION NO. 537 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. MR.VIJAYA SHEKAR THANGIAH S/O LATE MR. GEORGE THANGIAH, AGED 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 6, COMMISSARIAT ROAD, BENGALURU-560 025 2. MRS RACHEL CHITRA PRABHAKAR W/O MR. SATHI PRABHAKAR, AGED 62 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 6, COMMISSARIAT ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 025 3. MRS. G CHITRA POORNIMA, W/O LATE MR. GEORGE THANGIAH, AGED 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 6, COMMISSARIAT ROAD, BENGALURU 560 025 4. SUDEEP THANGAIAH S/O. VIJAY SHEKAR THANGIAH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 6, COMMISSARIAT ROAD, BENGALURU 560 025 5. SHONALI THANGIAH, Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31790-DB RP No. 537 of 2025 D/O. VIJAY SHEKAR THANGIAH AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 6, COMMISSARIAT ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 025 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K.G. RAGHAVAN, SENIOR COUNSEL ALONG WITH SMT. PRIYA KALE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. A SHIVAKUMAR S/O. ANANTHA PADMANABHA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O. 173/1, DODDAKANNAHALLI VILLAGE, CARMELARAM, SARJAPURA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU- 560 035 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU DISTRICT, K.G ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DISTRICT, K.G ROAD, BENGALURU -560 001 4. THE TAHSILDAR BENGALURU EAST TALUK, K.R PURAM, BENGALURU -560 010 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KRUTIKA RAGHAVAN, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. CHAYA K, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) THIS RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 R/W ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC, 1908 PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 13.10.2025 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP NO.32528/24 (ANNEXURE A). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31790-DB RP No. 537 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) 1. The present review petition has been filed seeking review of the judgment dated 13.10.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.32528/2024. 2. Heard Sri K.G.Raghavan, learned Senior Counsel assisted by learned counsel Smt.Priya Kale appearing for the review petitioners and learned counsel Smt.Krutika Raghavan for Smt.Chaya K., learned counsel for respondent No.1. 3. Sri K.G.Raghavan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the review petitioners submits that the only clarification in the judgment sought by the petitioners in the review petition is, in the order of injunction dated 23.10.2024 passed by Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Special Court in LGC (P) No.264/2024, the said Court has granted injunction in respect of entire schedule property, although the alleged encroached land is 2 guntas in Sy.No.7/1A2 bearing PID No.82-82-13 situated at 80 feet road, Binnamangala, Manavarthe Kaval, - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31790-DB RP No. 537 of 2025 K.R.Puram Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk, Bengaluru and as such, the same is required to be clarified. It is submitted that the schedule in the complaint itself has two portions; one in respect of which the petitioners are the absolute owners and the other in respect of alleged encroached portion of land. Smt.Krutika Raghavan, learned counsel for the respondent does not have any serious objection to the said submission of the learned Senior Counsel. 4. In view of the above, we clarify that the order of injunction dated 23.10.2024 passed by the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Special Court is confined to the alleged encroached portion of land. With the aforesaid clarification, the review petition is disposed of. SD/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE PKS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2