Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2504 (MAD)

Ponnurangan v. State rep. by, The Inspector of Police,

CRL OP/9077/2026 · 2026-04-10

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 9077 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 9077 of 2026 Ponnurangan S/o.Ramar, No.85(1), Keeraipatti Puthur Village, Harur Post and Taluk, Dharmapuri District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Harur Police Station, Dharmapuri District. (Crime.No.379 of 2025). ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event on their arrest by the Respondent Police in Crime No.379 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent police and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.J.Pradeep For Respondent(s): MR.P.DHILEEPAN, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL SIDE) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9077 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 303(2) of BNS, Act in Crime No.379 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner illegally transported 4 units of gravel sand in a tipper lorry bearing Registration No. KA 08 5948 without any valid permission. Hence, the complaint. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this is the third anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution’s case and, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner has two previous cases, similar in nature pending against him. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. In such view of the matter, the petitioner has two previous cases of the same nature, which clearly demonstrates that the petitioner has misused the liberty granted by this Court. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9077 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 10-04-2026 DRL To 1. The Inspector of Police, Harur Police Station, Dharmapuri District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9077 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. DRL CRL OP No. 9077 of 2026 10-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis