APHC010539642004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3572] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 356/2004 Between: 1. MOHAN LAL LALWANI, S/O LATE SRI TAKATMAL LALWANI BUSINESS R/O LALWANI HOUSE AMBATISATRAM JUNCTION VIZIANAGARAM. 2. SAVITRIBAI LALWANI @ RUKMINIBAI LALWANI, W/O SRI MOHANLAL LALWANI HOUSE WIFE R/O AMBATISATRAM JUNCTION VIZIANAGARAM. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. DOLMAL LALWANI, S/O LATE SRI TAKATMAL LALWANI BUSINESS R/O D.NO.22-1-22, LALWANI HOUSE AMBATISATRAM JUNCITON 2. LAKSHMI BAI LALWANI, W/O SRI DOLMAL LALWANI HOUSE WIFE R/O D.NO.22-1-22, LALWANI HOUSE AMBATISATRAM JUNCITON 3. TAKATMAL SURESH KUMAR LALWANI, S/O SRI DOLMAL LALWANI R/O D.NO.22-1-22, LALWANI HOUSE AMBATISATRAM JUNCITON 4. KANCHAN LALWANI, W/O SRI TAKATMAL SURESH KUMAR LALWANIL HOUSE WIFE R/O D.NO.22-1-22, LALWANI HOUSE AMBATISATRAM JUNCITON 2 5. HARISH KUMAR LALWANI, S/O SRI DOLMAL LALWANI BUSINESS R/O D.NO.22-1-22, LALWANI HOUSE AMBATISATRAM JUNCITON 6. JYOTHI LALWANI, D/O SRI DOLMAL LALWANI R/O D.NO.22-1-22, LALWANI HOUSE AMBATISATRAM JUNCITON 7. MUKESH LALWANI, S/O SRI DOLMAL LALWANI BUSINESS R/O D.NO.22-1-22, LALWANI HOUSE AMBATISATRAM JUNCITON 8. SUNDARDAS, S/O LATE SRI TAKATMAL LALWANI BUSINESS R/O D.NO.22-1-22, LALWANI HOUSE AMBATISATRAM JUNCITON 9. RUPABAI LALWANI DIED, D/O SIMHACHALAM N.M.R.VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA SWAMIVARI DEVASTHANAM, ANNAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 10. WANDANA LALWANI, D/O SRI SUNDAR DAS LALWANI R/O D.NO.22-1-22, LALWANI HOUSE AMBATISATRAM JUNCITON 11. DINESH LALWANLI, S/O SRI SUNDAR DAS LALWANI R/O D.NO.22-1-22, LALWANI HOUSE AMBATISATRAM JUNCITON ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against orders Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. - Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 356/2004 JUDGMENT: (per Hon?ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) The office has submitted fresh service report pursuant to the order dated 03.02.2026. 2. The office report dated 02.03.2026 is, as follows: <Appellant 1 & 2 – unserved, returned. (As per postal endorsement >no such person in this address=) 3. The notice was sent to the correct address as mentioned in the appeal. However, the notice was not served and received back with the postal endorsement 8no such person in this address9. 4. It appears that the appellants are no more interested in prosecuting the appeal. 5. The C.M.A. is dismissed for want of prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J _____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J Date: 03.03.2026 Pab 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO. 356 OF 2004 DATE: 03.03.2026 Pab