APHC010536082009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 263/2009 Between: 1. RAO HONEY, MAHARASHTRA, REP.BY GPA HOLDER, RANGA RAO, E.G.DT, D/O.VENKATA MAHIPATHI RAMA RAO,W/O.DR.SARAT GUMMADAPU C/O. VIJAY WANI, ADJACENT TO TALEWAR (TAHSILDAR), ISAJHI LAYOUT, SUDAMPURI, WARDHA 442004, MAHARASHTRA. REP.BY HER GPA HOLDER I.S.P.RANGA RAO, S/O. LATE VENKAT RAO, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 8-2-11, STUVARTPETA, PITHAPURAM, ...APPELLANT AND 1. RAJAH RAO PITHAPURAM E G DISTRICT AND 9 OTHERS, S/O. VENKATA KUMAR MAHIPATHI SURYARAO BAHADUR LAND OWNER PITHAPURAM, E.G.DISTRICT. 2. SRI RAJAH VENKATA KUMARA MAHIPATHI SURYARAO, S/O. VENKATA MAHIPATHI RANA RATNA RAO STUDENT NEAR GANDHINAGAR PARK, KAKINADA, E.G.DISTRICT. 3. M M K APPARAO, S/O. M.V.G.APPARAO STUDENT PORT, PITHAPURA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. R PADMAVATHI, W/O. R.V.M. SURYARAO R/O. PLOT NO. 18, CENOTPAH 2ND LINE, TEYNAMPETA, CHENNAI 600 018. 5. R GAYATHRIDEVI, W/O. PRADEEPRAO PLOT NO. 18, CENTOAPH 2ND LANE, (PLOT NO. 10, CENOTAPH 3RD LANE), 6. R S SURYARAO, S/O. PRADEEPRAO PLOT NO. 18, CENTOAPH 2ND LANE, (PLOT NO. 10, CENOTAPH 3RD LANE), 2 7. R SIMANTH, S/O. PRADEEPRAO PLOT NO. 18, CENTOAPH 2ND LANE, (PLOT NO. 10, CENOTAPH 3RD LANE), 8. R SUHIR, S/O. PRADEEP RAO PLOT NO. 18, CENTOAPH 2ND LANE, (PLOT NO. 10, CENOTAPH 3RD LANE), 9. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, KAKINADA. 10. RANGARAYA MEDICAL COLLEGE KAKINADA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL KAKINADA, E.G.DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): appeal against the judgment and decree dated 19-1-2009 in O.S. No. 28 of 1989 on the file of the Court of 1st Additional Senior Civil Judge at Kakinada. Counsel for the Appellant: 1. - Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR APPEALS 2. D SRINIVAS 3. M BALASUBRAHMANYAM JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) On 10.03.2025, the following order was passed:- “It is brought to the notice of this Court that learned counsel for the appellant is no more. 2. Issue notice to the appellant. 3. List the matter after four (4) weeks in the weekly cause list.” 2. On 07.04.2025, the following order was passed:- “1. As per the office report dated 03.04.2025, notice sent to appellant is not yet returned. 2. Post after four (04) weeks in the weekly cause-list with fresh office report.” 3. The office has submitted report dated 02.05.2025 as under:- 3 “It is respectfully submitted that as per the India Post tracking system, the notice has been successfully delivered to the appellant. However, the physical acknowledgement has not been received in AR section from the concerned Tappal Section. A copy of the India Post tracking status confirming delivery is attached herewith for your kind perusal.” 4. None appears for the appellant. 5. Sri Y. Rama Tirtha, learned counsel appears for respondent No.1. 6. Sri M. Bala Subrahmanyam, learned counsel appears for respondent No.2 through virtual mode. 7. Sri Vijay, learned counsel appears for respondent No.9. 8. The matter is of the year 2009 and printed under the caption old cases. 9. The appeal has been dismissed for want of prosecution. 10. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ___________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J GVK 4 88 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM A.S. No.263 of 2009 Dt. 29.01.2026 GVK