Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25024 (PAT)

Nagendra Bhagat v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./34215/2026 · 2026-07-14

Sandeep Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34215 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-250 Year-2022 Thana- GOVINDGANJ District- East Champaran ====================================================== Nagendra Bhagat S/o Late Gopal Bhagat Village- Jhakhra, P.S. - Govindganj, District - East Champaran, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar Bihar 2. Brajkishor Prasad S/o Late Satyanarayan Bhagat R/o Village - Jhakhra, P.S. - Govindganj, Dist. - East Champaran, Bihar. 3. Sharda Kumari D/o Late Satyanaryan Bhagat R/o Village - Jhakhra, P.S. - Govindganj, Dist. - East Champaran, Bihar. 4. Sumiya Devi Wife of Brajkishor Prasad R/o Village - Jhakhra, P.S. - Govindganj, Dist. - East Champaran, Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Natraj Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 14-07-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. 2. The present application has been filed seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to Opposite Party Nos. 2 to 4 vide order dated 03.12.2025 passed by learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, East Champaran, Motihari in A.B.P. No. 5391 of 2025 arising out of Govindganj P.S. Case No. 250 of 2022, registered under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 379, 504 and 354B of I.P.C. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not able to Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34215 of 2026(2) dt.14-07-2026 2/2 make out a case for cancellation of bail. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the materials available on record, this Court finds no ground to interfere with the impugned order passed by the court below. 5. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T