Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25020 (AP)

CH. KRISHNA, E.G. DIST v. COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, ENDOWMENTS DEPT, HYD & 3 OT

WP/19486/2013 · 2026-03-08

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010531862013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 19486/2013 Between: 1. CH. KRISHNA, E.G. DIST, S/O. PADMA RAJU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC: COOK AT SRI RANI VATSAVAYI BUTCHI SEETHAYYARRA CHOULTRY, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, PEDDAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS ENDOWMENTS DEPT HYD 3 OT, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, TILAK NAGAR, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, RAMARAOPETA, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, DANAVAIPETA, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE SRI RANI VATSAVAYI BUTCHI SEETHAYYAMMA CHOULTRY, REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, PEDDAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents herein particularly Respondent No. 4 in issuing proceedings vide Rc. No. 7/2013 dated 02.04.2013 as illegal, arbitrary, erroneous and against the Rule 9 of 2 Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institution and Endowments Officer Holder and Services Rules, 2000 by further declaring that the Petitioner's age of superannuation shall be 60 years and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WVMP 2226 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 08.07.2013 made in WPMPNo.23848/2013 in WPNo.19486/2013 IA NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP 23848 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondents herein particularly Respondent No. 4 to continue the Petitioner as cook by suspending the impugned proceedings vide Rc. No. 7/2013 dated 02.04.2013 pending disposal of main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A K KISHORE REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V T M PRASAD 2. KOTESWARA RAO KAPPERA SC For Endowments 3. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following: 3 Order:- The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner attained the age of superannuation and that his services were continued as a Security Guard in terms of the interim order passed by this Court on 08.07.2013. 2. Recording the same, this writ petition is closed in terms of the interim order passed by this Court dated 08.07.2013. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 09.03.2026 PNS