103 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.34875 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.07.2026 Mo Sabir @ Mohd Sabir …..Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana .....Respondent. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Mr. Nafeesh Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Sahni, Addl. A.G, Haryana. VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not press the instant petition and the petitioner shall surrender before the Court concerned. He, however, prays that a direction may be issued to the Court concerned to expeditiously decide his bail application since two co-accused have already been granted regular bail. 2. In view of the statement given by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of as having been withdrawn. However, in case the petitioner surrenders before the Court concerned within a period of seven days from today and files an application for the grant of bail, the same be decided expeditiously, especially keeping in view the fact that two co-accused have already been granted regular bail. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) July 01, 2026 JUDGE Yag Dutt Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No YAG DUTT 2026.07.01 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.