Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25014 (ORI)

RANJIT KUMAR RAY @ RANAJIT KUMAR RAY v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/15467/2026 · 2026-07-10

Chittaranjan Dash

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.15467 of 2026 Ranjit Kumar Ray @ Ranajit Kumar Ray …. Petitioner Mr. P.S. Das, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & another …. Opp. Parties Mr. S.K. Jee, AGA CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH Order No. ORDER 10.07.2026 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Parties. 2. By means of this application, the Petitioner seeks the indulgence of this Court for a direction to the Opposite Party No.2, the Financier for issuance of “No Dues Certificate” as against the repayment of entire loan by the Petitioner reflected in the statement of account placed under Annexure-1. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that in connection with the aforesaid matter, he has made a representation before the authorities i.e. Opposite Party No.2 on 10.03.2026 but the Opposite Party No.2 has not responded to his representation. Learned counsel further submits that his representation pending before the authority be directed to be disposed of within a stipulated period. 4. keeping in view the short question to be answered by the Opposite Party No.2, the representation pending before it, if not p. 2 disposed of in the meanwhile, be considered and disposed of within a period of one month and the result thereof be communicated to the Petitioner as well as the Opposite Party No.1 within a period of one week thereafter. Non-compliance of the order would give liberty to the Petitioner to move further in accordance with law. 5. The Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Chittaranjan Dash) Judge Bijay