PHUMAN SINGH v. PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AND OTHERS
CWP/18836/2026 · 2026-07-01
Namit Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25013 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25013 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-18836-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
Phuman Singh Punjab State Power
CORAM:
Present:
NAMIT KUMAR, J.
1.
Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay remaining gratuity i.e. Rs.53,832/ alongwith interest at the rate of 8% per annum and pa 8% per annum on the delayed payment of retiral benefits in view of the
judgment of this Court others, 1997 (3) SCT 468
2.
petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the competent
3.
4.
within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided by 2026 (O&M) (1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Phuman Singh
Versus Punjab State Power Corporation Limited & others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR
Mr. Pankaj Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Akash Vashisth, Advocate, for the respondents NAMIT KUMAR, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus the respondents to pay remaining gratuity i.e. Rs.53,832/ alongwith interest at the rate of 8% per annum and pa 8% per annum on the delayed payment of retiral benefits in view of the
judgment of this Court reported as A.S.Randhawa Vs. State of Punjab & others, 1997 (3) SCT 468. After arguing the case for some time, learned counsel for petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the competent authority for redressal of his remaining grievance. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. If any such representation has been submitted by the petitioner within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided by IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18836-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.07.2026
...Petitioner Corporation Limited & others ...Respondents NAMIT KUMAR for the petitioner. Mr. Akash Vashisth, Advocate, for the respondents-PSPCL. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus the respondents to pay remaining gratuity i.e. Rs.53,832/- alongwith interest at the rate of 8% per annum and pay interest at the rate of 8% per annum on the delayed payment of retiral benefits in view of the A.S.Randhawa Vs. State of Punjab & for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach authority for redressal of his remaining grievance. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. If any such representation has been submitted by the petitioner within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided by
The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus - y interest at the rate of 8% per annum on the delayed payment of retiral benefits in view of the A.S.Randhawa Vs. State of Punjab & the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach If any such representation has been submitted by the petitioner within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided by VIMAL KUMAR 2026.07.01 15:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
CWP-18836-2026 the competent authority within two months thereafter by passing a speaking
order after affording an opportunity of pers
01.07.2026 Vimal
2026 (O&M) (2)
the competent authority within two months thereafter by passing a speaking
order after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner.
Whether speaking/reasoned:
Whether reportable:
the competent authority within two months thereafter by passing a speaking onal hearing to the petitioner.
(NAMIT KUMAR)
JUDGE
Yes/No Yes/No
the competent authority within two months thereafter by passing a speaking VIMAL KUMAR 2026.07.01 15:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.