SMT. BELSIYA BAI RATHORE v. CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER TRANSMISSION COMPANY LIMITED
WPS/1974/2025 · 2026-01-26
Shri Parth Prateem Sahu
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2501 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2501 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 / 4
2026:CGHC:4533
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1974 of 2025 1 - Smt. Belsiya Bai Rathore W/o Late Heera Lal Rathore Aged About 56 Years R/o Village- Hirri, Tahsil And Distt.- Anuppur (M.P.) 2 - Ganesh Kumar Rathore S/o Late Heera Lal Rathore Aged About 29 Years R/o Village- Hirri, Tahsil And Distt.- Anuppur (M.P.)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited Through Its Managing Director, 2nd Floor, Vidhyut Sewa Bhawan, Daganiya, Raipur, Distt, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Deputy General Manager, (Human Recourse), Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited, 3rd Floor, In Front Of Vidhyut Sewa Bhawan, Daganiya, Raipur, Distt, Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Executive Director, Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited, Ground Floor, In Front Of Vidhyut Sewa Bhawan, Daganiya, Raipur, Distt, Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Chief Engineer (Line), Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Digitally signed by PRAVEEN KUMAR SINHA Date: 2026.01.28 18:27:28 +0530
2 / 4 Limited, Ground Floor, In Front Of Vidhyut Sewa Bhawan, Daganiya, Raipur, Distt, Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Executive Engineer, (Ati Uchch Daab) Maintenance Division, Korba, Distt.- Korba (C.G.) (Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited)
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Ms. Najmeen, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Yogendra Chaturvedi, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
Order on Board 27.01.2026
1. Petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:
“10.1) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/ directions and direct the respondent authorities to pass appropriate order regarding the compassionate appointment to the petitioner no. 2. 10.2) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to decide the case of petitioners for compassionate appointment to the petitioner no. 2 without compelling him to adduce consent letter of the second wife (Smt. Munni Bai) of the deceased Heera Lal Rathore. 10.3) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper also kindly be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.”
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that father of petitioners Late Shri Heera Lal Rathore while working on the post of Attendant Grade-2 (Line) died in harness on 07.08.2019. Petitioners thereafter submitted
3 / 4 an application for grant of compassionate appointment on 15.10.2019. However, till date claim of petitioner is not considered and decided.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that upon going through the application submitted by petitioner it revealed that some more documents/information is required and therefore a letter dated 24.12.2025 was issued to Executive Director (Line) of Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited and copy of this letter is also forwarded to petitioner No.2.However, till date documents and information as sought for are not submitted. He submits that as soon as requisite information and documents are provided by petitioner No.2, decision will be taken on the application for grant of compassionate appointment submitted by petitioners.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the documents annexed along with writ petition.
5. Grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that application submitted by petitioner No.2 for grant of compassionate appointment dated 15.10.2019 is not considered and decided even after lapse of more than 6 years. Perusal of letter dated 24.12.2025 placed by
learned counsel for the respondents before this Court, would show that respondents have issued letter mentioning documents to be submitted by petitioner No.2 and as submitted by learned counsel for respondents, till date, documents are not submitted and therefore I find it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition at this stage directing petitioner No.2 to submit requisite documents and information as mentioned in letter dated 24.12.2025 (copy of which is already handed over to learned counsel for petitioners) and respondents authorities are
4 / 4 further directed to take decision on claim of petitioners, within a further period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of documents on application for grant of compassionate appointment submitted by petitioner No.2, in accordance with law.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, writ petition stands
disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Praveen