Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25002 (CHH)

UDAY BHAN DUBEY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2707/2022 · 2026-07-06

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010128352022 2026:CGHC:27949 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2707 of 2022 1 - Uday Bhan Dubey S/o Late Ram Samujh Dubey Aged About 39 Years Presently Working On The Post Of Constable M.T. (Motor Trade) At Police Station Balrampur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home Mahanadi Bhawan Atalnagar Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Director General Of Police Police Head Quarter Sector 19 Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Inspector General Of Police Surguja Range Ambikapur District Surguja Chhattisgarh. 4 - Superintendent Of Police Balrampur District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh. 5 - Ramkeshwar Bakhla Working On The Post Of Head Constable (M.T.) Batch No. 21 S.P. Office Surajpur District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. 6 - Amresh Dubey Working On The Post Of Head Constable (M.T.) Batch No. 23 S.P. Office Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. 7 - Avinash Panna Working On The Post Of Head Constable (M.T.) Batch No. 18 S.P. Office Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. 8 - Suleman Tirki Working On The Post Of Head Constable (M.T.) Batch No. 19 S.P. Office Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents Digitally signed by HEERA LAL SAHU Date: 2026.07.07 16:58:45 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. A.N. Pandey, Advocate. For State : Mr. Keshav Prasad Gupta, G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order On Board 07/07/2026 1. The instant petition has been preferred against the illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable action on the part of the respondent authorities by which the name of the petitioner has not been considered for promotion on the post of constable (MT) to Head Constable (MT) where the junior from the petitioner have already promoted vide order dated 06.12.2012 which is contrary to clause 5 SOP dated 20.10.1993. 2. Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 24.06.2026, an affidavit has been filed by the petitioner. 3. Heard on I.A. No. 01/2026, application for withdrawal of this petition. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file duly constituted petition. 5. Upon due consideration and for the reasons stated in the application, I.A. No. 01/2026 is allowed. 6. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge H.L. Sahu