1 CGHC010102632022 2026:CGHC:27992 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2120 of 2022 * - Birbal Singh S/o Ramjilal Aged About 32 Years R/o Sector 3, Bhilai, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - Union Of India Through Secretary, Ministry Of Home Department, New Delhi 2 - Director General CISF, Central Industrial Security Force, Headquarter, 13 CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi Pin 110003 3 - Inspector General Central Industrial Security Force, Central Sector Headquarter, Utai, Bhilai, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - Deputy Inspector General/Medical, Central Industrial Security Force, Headquarter, 13 CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi Pin 110003 5 - Inspector General, Central Industrial Security Force, Central Zone Headquarter, Utai, Bhilai, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 6 - Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force, Unit Bhilai Steel, Bhilai, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mrs. Renu Kochar, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Abhishek Banjare, Central Government Counsel Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 07/07/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 That the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ in the nature of certiorari and quash order dated 18.12.2021 (Annexure P-1) and 04.01.2022 (Annexure P-2) Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.07.07 17:31:37 +0530 2 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be to direct the respondent authority to revoke the suspension of the petitioner to the post Constable as per merits and shall provide all such benefits that the enjoyed by the virtue of his position as Constable in CISF. 10.3 That, the Hon’ble High Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ in the nature of certiorari and quashed letter dated 10.06.2023 (Annexure P-5) and memo dated 17.06.2023 (Annexure P-6). 10.4 That, this Hon’ble Court may be further pleased to pass any other consequential and other orders/ writs which this Hon’ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that vide order dated 25.11.2025 in a different departmental enquiry, penalty of dismissal from services has been passed against the petitioner by the Disciplinary Authority and thus, this petition has become infructuous. 3. At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would seek permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to challenge the subsequent order. She would further seek liberty to assail the order impugned of this writ petition, if favourable order is passed in the matter of removal from services. 4. No objection from other side. 5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty as stated above. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti