Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24999 (AP)

NARABOINA VINAY BABU v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/27798/2023 · 2026-01-05

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010533912023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27798/2023 Between: 1. NARABOINA VINAY BABU, S/O PAPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43YRS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O H.NO.88-16-2852, SAI NAGAR, 15T LINE, NALLAPADU ROAD, AMMA ASHRAM BESIDE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, , POLICE HEADQUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT, 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KROSURU POLICE STATION, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No, 4 in calling the petitioner to the office of the 4th respondent and threatened him into settle the dispute with the complainant in Cr.No.34/2023 of Krosuru Police 2 Station, Palnadu District is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIVA RAMA KRISHNA IRLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27798 of 2023 ORDER: 1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No, 4 in calling the petitioner to the office of the 4th respondent and threatened him into settle the dispute with the complainant in Cr.No.34/2023 of Krosuru Police Station, Palnadu District is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.” 2. Heard Sri Siva Rama Krishna Irla, learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner would submit that police are calling the petitioner to the police station and threatening him to settle the dispute with the complainant in Crime No.34/2023 of Krosuru Police Station, Palnadu District. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, for respondents, on instructions, would submit that basing on the complaint of one Y. Udayalakshmi, a case in Crime No.34/2023 was registered against the petitioner and others for the offence punishable under Section 420 read with 34 IPC and the police never threatened the petitioner to settle the dispute. 4 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, police are directed not to interfere with the civil disputes between both the parties, except in accordance with law. 6. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 06.01.2026 ARB/JAK 5 354 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27798 of 2023 Date: 06.01.2026 ARB/JAK