Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24997 (JHR)

NIRAJ KUMAR DAS ALIAS NIRAJ DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5206/2026 · 2026-09-03

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:26689 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5206 of 2026 1. Niraj Kumar Das @ Niraj Das, aged about 20 years, S/O - Anil Das, R/O Village - SuriyaBandhi, P.O +P.S. - Devipur, District - Deoghar. 2. Amar Kumar Das @ Amar Das, aged about 22 years, S/O - Anil Das, R/O Village - SuriyaBandhi, P.O +P.S. - Devipur, District - Deoghar … … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Advocate --- 09/3rd September 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in custody in connection with (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 06 of 2026, registered under Sections 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and 84(C) of the IT Act, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum- Cyber Crime Special Court, Deoghar. 2. The explanation of the Superintendent of Police, Deoghar has been placed on record. 3. With respect to petitioner no. 1, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he is in custody since 11.01.2026 having one criminal antecedent of similar nature. One Mobile and two SIM cards, standing in the name of third person, are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, but no victim has been identified so far and there is just one crime link. 4. With respect to petitioner no. 2, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he is also in custody since 11.01.2026 having one criminal antecedent. One mobile and two SIM cards, standing in the name 2026:JHHC:26689 2 of third person, are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. One victim has been identified and there are two crime links. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the charge has been framed on 27.05.2026, but no witnesses are turning up so far. 6. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners are not in dispute. The learned counsel submits that communication has been made with the authorities at other locations to find out the criminal antecedents and the crime links of the petitioner and there are number of co-accused and consequently there are number of crime links. 7. To this, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a number of co-accused have been enlarged on bail. 8. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, considering the custody of the petitioners since 11.01.2026 and the fact that the charge has already been framed on 27.05.2026, but no witnesses are turning up, the petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge- II-cum- Cyber Crime Special Court, Deoghar in connection with (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 06 of 2026, subject to the following conditions: - (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioners. (ii) The other bailor should be their close relative. (iii) The petitioners will attend the court on each and every date and on account of their single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioners. (iv) The petitioners would deposit a self-attested copy of their Aadhar Card along with their Mobile Number before the 2026:JHHC:26689 3 learned court below, which they shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioners shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 9. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 10. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 03.09.2026 Uploaded On: 03.09.2026 Mukul/-