APHC010527142013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 17159/2013 Between: 1. KODI RANI, W/O RAVI KUMAR,, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, RIO BRAHMANDAPURAM, VANIKUNTA REVENUE VILLAGE, EPIUUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT AT GUNTUR. 2. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT SEVA PROGRAMME, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER INTEGRATED CHILD, DEVELOPMENT SEVA PROGRAMME, EPURU, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. CHEERAM NAGA MALLESWARI, ANGANWADI WORKER, BRAHMANDAPURAM, VANIKUNTA REVENUE VILLAGE, EPURUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the order in proceedings No.1064/A12012, dated 8.10.2012 of the 3rd respondent appointing the 4th respondent as Anganwadi Worker for SC locality Centre (Anganwadi Centre 2 No.39), Brahmandapuram, Vanikunta Revenue Village, Epurur Mandal, Guntur District as illegal, arbitrary, discrimination, violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner herein as the Anganwadi Worker for SC locality Centre (Anganwadi Centre No.39), Brahmandapuram, Vanikunta Revenue Village, Epurur Mandal, Guntur District, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 20823 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings No.1064/A12012, dated 8.10.2012 of the 3rd respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. MUTHINENI KOTESWARA RAO 3. GP FOR WOMEN DEV, CHILD WELFARE The Court made the following: 3 Order:- None represented for the petitioner today. On earlier occasion also, there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 31.03.2026 PNS