2026:JHHC:26444 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8181 of 2026 Sachin Bhadani @ Sachin Kumar Bhadani, S/O – Sujit Bhadani @ Sujeet Kumar Bhadani, Aged about - 25 yrs, Resident of Village - Jhalpo, Jhumri Telaiya, P.O Jhumri Telaiya P.S-Telaiya, District- Koderma Permanent address - Vill - Katiya, Parsabad, P.O - Prasabad, P.S - Jainagar, Dist – Koderma … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Abhinav Prakash, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Subodh Kr. Dubey, APP --- 05/02.09.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 31.05.2026 in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No. 171 of 2026 corresponding to Special POCSO Case No. 22 of 2026, registered under Sections 64(1), 74 and 76 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 8/12 of P.O.C.S.O Act, now pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I Cum Special Judge (P.O.C.S.O Act) Koderma. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that as per the FIR, the petitioner and co-accused Saurabh Bhadani, who are brothers, have outraged the modesty of the minor victim and tried to commit rape. The learned counsel submits as per the allegation, brother of the petitioner escaped, but so far as the petitioner is concerned, he was caught and ultimately the family members of the victim allowed the petitioner to leave, as he happens to be the friend of Shivam Vishwakarma, with whom the marriage of the victim was already fixed. The learned counsel submits that the date of incident is 28.05.2026 at 10 p.m. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner thereafter submits that the present case is a counterblast to the case which was instituted by the petitioner on the previous date in connection with the incident which 2026:JHHC:26444 2 had happened at 2:45 p.m. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner also suffered injuries on head and hand and has referred to the documents regarding treatment of the petitioner in Sadar Hospital, Koderma in emergency department on 28.05.2026 at 16:42 hours. 5. The learned counsel has further submitted that the victim of the present case also refused for medical examination and the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that charge sheet has already been submitted. 6. Learned counsel for the state has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions which have been made by the learned counsel for the petitioner based on the materials placed on record, are not in dispute. 7. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that there is a case and counter case; the petitioner had instituted the case on the date previous to the filing of the present FIR and the victim has also denied medical examination and the charge sheet having been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I Cum Special Judge (P.O.C.S.O Act) Koderma in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No. 171 of 2026 corresponding to Special POCSO Case No. 22 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not disturb the victim and her family members in any manner whatsoever. (ii) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (iii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iv) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (v) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the 2026:JHHC:26444 3 learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (vi) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 8. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 9. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:02.09.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading: 03.09.2026