[2026:JHHC:26539] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8141 of 2026 ------ Vikash Kumar, aged about 29 years, son of Ganesh Choudhary, resident of Kendua Toli, P.O.- Neori Vikas, P.S.- Sadar, Ranchi .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Anuradha Sahay, Addl.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Rahul Dev, Advocate Mr. Priyanshu Nilesh, Advocate ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-02-09-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chutia P.S. Case No. 44 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 340(2), 61, 111(2)(b), 111(4), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused person Rakesh Kumar, purchased an i-phone worth Rs.82,900/- and submitted documents for obtaining the loan including the forged Aadhar Card. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that though charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 11.04.2026 as mentioned in para-12 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-11 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 21.07.2026 passed in B.A. No.6825 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the informant on the other hand oppose the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi in connection with Chutia P.S. Case No. 44 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 02.09.2026 Saroj/