Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24974 (KAR)

MAJU BEE D S v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/9687/2022 · 2026-06-24

R Nataraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31439 WP No. 9687 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 9687 OF 2022 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: MAJU BEE D.S. D/O LATE SYED MASTAN SHAH @ BABA SHAH, W/O DASTAGIR SHARIFF AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/A NO 825, 4TH MAIN, 1ST CROSS BABA LAIN, DARGHA MOHALLA VIJINAPURA DOORAVANINAGAR, BANGALORE NORTH, BANGALORE-16 …PETITIONER (BY MS. KRUTHIKA CHANDRASHEKAR JAMKHANDI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SUBBA REDDY K.N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY UNDER SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KIADB (METRO RAIL PROJECT) 1ST FLOOR, ARAVINDA BHAVAN NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE-01 3. THE GENERAL MANAGER (LAND ACQUISITION AND A) BANGALORE METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. OPP. GATE NO.10, CHINNASWAMY STADIUM M.G. ROAD, BANGALORE-560001 4. HASINA BEGUM D/O LATE SYED HUSSAIN SHA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31439 WP No. 9687 of 2022 5. SYED AMANULLA S/O LATE SYED HUSSAIN SHA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 6. SYED NAGINA BEE D/O LATE SYED HUSSAIN SHA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 7. SYED AKRAM S/O LATE SYED HUSSAIN SHA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS 8. SYED ASLAM S/O LATE SYED HUSSAIN SHA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 9. SMT. SYEDA AZEEM AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS D/O LATE SYED HUSSAIN SHA, 10. SYED DASTAGIR SHA S/O LATE SYED HUSSAIN SHA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS 11. SMT SHAMSHAD BI D/O LATE SYED HUSSAIN SHA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS 12. SMT. RASHIDA D/O LATE SYED HUSSAIN SHA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 13. SYED RIYAZ S/O LATE HUSSAIN SHA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS 14. SYED FAYAZ S/O LATE HUSSAIN SHA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS 15. SMT BALKIS FATHIMA D/O LATE HUSSAIN SHA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31439 WP No. 9687 of 2022 16. SYED PYARE JAN S/O SYED BABA SHA, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS 17. SRI NAVEED S/O LATE CHOTI MA, 18. SMT. FARZANA D/O LATE CHOTI MA, 19. SMT SHABANA D/O LATE CHOTI MA, 20. SMT SALMA D/O LATE CHOTI MA, 21. SMT PYARI BI D/O LATE SYED BABA SHA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 22. SMT AKBARI D/O LATE SYED ANWAR SHA, 23. GULNAZ D/O LATE SYED ANWAR SHA, 24. SMT ASMA D/O LATE SYED ANWAR SHA, 25. SMT NUSRATH D/O LATE SYED ANWAR SHA, 26. SMT SAHERA D/O LATE SYED ANWAR SHA, RESPONDENT NOS.4 TO 26 ARE RESIDING AT R/A NO.386, 2ND MAIN, 4TH CROSS DARGHA MOHALLA, VIJINAPURA DOORVANINAGAR, BANGALORE NORTH, BANGALORE-16 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ADITYA DIWAKAR, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31439 WP No. 9687 of 2022 SRI. ASHOK N. NAYAK, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2; SRI. N.N.HARISH, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.3; SRI. N.R.NAIK, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.5 AND 14; SRI. V. SHANKARAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.16; NOTICE SERVED ON RESPONDENT NOS.8, 12, 17 TO 21 AND 25 AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 3 HEREIN TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 06.05.2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND A1 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS AUTHORITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioner has also sought for liberty to initiate proceedings afresh, if required. 2. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, it appears that the petitioner has brokered peace with the contesting respondents and has agreed to receive portion of compensation. In that view of the matter, nothing survives for consideration in this petition. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31439 WP No. 9687 of 2022 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the liberty sought for is refused. If the petitioner is entitled to file a fresh petition on a fresh cause of action, she is at liberty to do so. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE PMR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11