R. C. VENKATESHAGOWDA v. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
WA/1342/2024 · 2026-06-19
D K Singh, T M Nadaf
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24973 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24973 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30323-DB WA No. 1342 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT APPEAL NO. 1342 OF 2024 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN:
1.
R. C. VENKATESHAGOWDA S/O T CHANNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS C/O GENERAL SECRETARY KSRTC AND BMTC UNITED EMPLOYEES UNION NO.23, 4TH MAIN ROAD MATHIKERE EXTENSION BANGALORE - 560 054. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SHEKAR L., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, BANGALORE RURAL DIVISION MYSORE ROAD BANGALORE - 560 026 BY ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER REP BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER.
2.
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER K.S.R.T.C., KOLAR DIVISION, KOLAR 563 101.
REP BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER.
3.
THE DIRECTOR (P AND E)
Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30323-DB WA No. 1342 of 2024
REVISION AUTHORITY K.S.R.T.C., CENTRAL OFFICE K H ROAD BANGALORE - 560 027 REP BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER …RESPONDENTS (BY Ms.H.R.RENUKA, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 26.10.2023 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WRIT PETITION No. 58116/2018 CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
The present intra court appeal has been filed impugning the
judgment and order dated 26.09.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.58116/2018. The appellant appears to be an incorrigible employee in committing the misconduct time and again. The records disclose that the appellant has been guilty of misconduct of similar nature on 14 occasions earlier for which he was punished with major penalty of dismissal from service by the authority vide
order dated 30.03.2002. The appellate authority rejected the appeal vide order dated 16.04.2003. However, the Reviewing Authority
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30323-DB WA No. 1342 of 2024
modified the order of dismissal by directing his reinstatement as fresh appointee with forfeiture of past services rendered by him.
2. The appellant did not raise any objection to the order passed by the Reviewing Authority dated 14.10.2003 whereby the punishment order of dismissal was modified for reinstatement of the appellant as a fresher. The appellant raised the industrial dispute only in the year 2015, after delay of 7 long years from the date of the order passed by the Reviewing Authority.
3. The Industrial Tribunal vide award dated 23.12.2017 modified the order passed by the Reviewing Authority and restored the appellant's past services.
4. The learned Single Judge having considered the misconduct of the appellant allowed the writ petition filed by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation vide impugned
judgment and set aside the order passed by the Industrial Tribunal. The learned Single Judge has taken note of the past misconducts of appellant/petitioner as well as of inordinate and unexplained delay and laches in raising the dispute after 7 years.
5. We are of the view that the judgment of the learned Single Judge impugned in this appeal does not require interference.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30323-DB WA No. 1342 of 2024
Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed. However, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
RKA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7