Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24973 (CHH)

RAM PRASAD VISHWAKARMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1352/2026 · 2026-07-05

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010184722026 2026:CGHC:27636-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1352 of 2026 1 - Ram Prasad Vishwakarma S/o Late Shri Ramcharan Vishwakarma, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Block No. 5, Room No.5, Chouhan Green Valley, Junwani, Police Station- Bhilai, Smriti Nagar, Supela, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station- Mahila Thana, District- Durg (C.G.) 2 - Ranu Vishwakarma W/o Ram Prasad Vishwakarma, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Block B, Flat No.5, Chouhan Green Valley, Junwani Bhilai, District- Durg (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Ms. Pranoti Das, Advocate. For State/Respondents : Ms. Anusha Naik, Deputy Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 06-07-2026 1. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer:- “1. Quash FIR No.38/2026 dated 15.04.2026 registered at Digitally signed by MOHAMMED AADIL KHAN Date: 2026.07.07 17:49:50 +0530 2 Police Station- Mahila Thana, District- Durg (C.G.) for offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 296 of the BNS, 2023, insofar as the present petitioner is concerned. 2. Pass any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 13.05.2026 the matter was referred to the Mediation Center to get the dispute between the parties settled through mediation and the petitioner No.1 was directed to deposit Rs.1,00,000/- with the Mediation Center of this Court, but the petitioner is unable to manage the above fund and wants to withdraw this petition. Therefore, he has filed in the present petition I.A. No.02/2026, application for withdrawal of the instant petition, which may be allowed. 3. In view of the submission made on behalf of the petitioner, I.A. No.02/2026 is allowed and the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn without any further liberty. 4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Aadil