Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24972 (ORI)

PAPU KUMAR PAL v. THE TAHASILDAR, JATANI

WP(C)/19268/2026 · 2026-07-10

Sashikanta Mishra

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.19268 of 2026 CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER 10.07.2026 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing counsel for the State. 3. The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayer: “It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the present writ petition and, after hearing the learned counsel appearing for both parties, be further pleased to issue a Writ/Writs in the nature of Mandamus by quashing Annexure-4 to the writ petition, namely the order dated 07.05.2026 passed in Mutation Case No. 2504/2026 by the Tahasildar, Jatani and further direct the concerned Tahasildar to record/mutate the schedule property in favour of the petitioner on the basis of the registered Sale Deed No. 11122503484 dated 03.09.2025; And/Or Pass such other order/orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. And for this act of kindness, the petitioner, as in duty bound shall ever pray. “ 4. Since the impugned order is appealable, the writ application is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to prefer appeal, if Papu Kumar Pal .… Petitioner Represented by Mr. R.K.Sahu, Advocate -Versus- The Tahasildar, Jatani .… Opp. Parties Represented by Mr. G.Mohanty, Standing Counsel Order No. 01. . p. 2 so advised before the appropriate authority within ten days from today. (Sashikanta Mishra) Judge Deepak