Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2497 (HP)

INDER SINGH v. TEJ RAM SHARMA

CRMPM/97/2026 · 2026-01-19

Rakesh Kainthla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Inder Singh vs. Tej Ram Sharma Cr.MP(M) No. 97 of 2026 19.1.2026 Present: Mr. Mohar Chand Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Kumar Tyagi, Advocate, vice Mr. Rajul Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent. Power of Attorney on behalf of respondent filed. Mr. Ashok Kumar Tyagi, learned vice counsel representing the respondent, under instructions, submits that he has no objection in case the present application is allowed and the delay in filing the revision is ordered to be condoned. In view of this, the present application is allowed and the delay in filing the revision is ordered to be condoned. Application stands disposed of. Cr. Revision (ST) No. 280 of 2026 Since the delay in filing the revision has been ordered to be condoned vide separate order passed in Cr.MP(M) No. 97 of 2026, the revision be registered. Copy of the petition be supplied to the learned counsel for the respondent. Record be called for. List the matter on 23.1.2026, as prayed for. Cr.MP (ST) No. 281 of 2016 Notice in the aforesaid terms. Reply to the application, if any be filed within two days and list the present application along with main matter. (Rakesh Kainthla) Vacation Judge 19th January, 2026 (Nikita)