Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24964 (AP)

MADDI SREENIVASA RAO v. SRIRAM MALLESWARA RAO & 2 OTHERS

CMA/208/2015 · 2026-01-05

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, Ravi Nath Tilhari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010531192015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 208/2015 Between: 1. MADDI SREENIVASA RAO, S/O VENKATESWARLU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS, R/O NEAR BHAVANI CENTRE, ADDANKI TWON AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. SRIRAM MALLESWARA RAO 2 OTHERS, S/O RAMAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCCUPATION: KIRANA MERCHANT, R/O KALLAMVARIPALEM VILLAGE, J. PANGULUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.. 2. SRIRAM SIVA NAGESWARA RAO, S/O RAMAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCCUPATION: CYCLE MECHANIC, R/O UPPUMAGULURU VILLAGE, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. SRIRAM RAMA SUBBAMMA, W/O RAMAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSE-WIFE, R/O UPPUMAGULURU VILLAGE, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against ordersaggrieved by the Order Dated: 29-12-2014 in GWOP No. 18 of 2012 on the file of the I-Additional District Judge, Ongole. Counsel for the Appellant: 1. VENKATESWARLU CHAKKILAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 208/2015 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) The petition filed by the father seeking custody of the minor children from the respondents under Sections 9 & 10 of Guardian and Wards Act was dismissed by the learned I Additional District Judge, Ongole. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal was preferred by the father. 2. No representation for the appellant. 3. The matter pertains to the year 2015 and is listed under the caption ‘old matters’. 4. In view of the above, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for ‘want of prosecution’. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J Dated: 06.01.2026 AG 172 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 208/2015 Dated: 06.01.2026 AG