Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2496 (UTT)

MOHIT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/42/2026 · 2026-03-24

Ashish Naithani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Dat e Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2026:UHC:2098 BA 1st No.42 of 2026 Mohit Vs. State of Uttarakhand Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Abhishek Verma, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, learned AGA, for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. In the High Court of Uttarakhand, the present case arises from Bail Application filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking regular bail for the Applicant – Mohit, who has been accused in FIR/Case Crime No.140 of 2025, under Sections 64 (1), 87, 137 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and under Sections 5/6 of the POCSO Act, at Police Station ITI, District Udham Singh Nagar. 4. Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that there is a love relationship between the Applicant and the victim, and it has wrongly been given the criminal colour. He further submits that the Applicant has no criminal history, and he has falsely been roped in the present matter. 5. Learned State Counsel has vehemently opposed the bail application of the Applicant on the ground that in the present matter victim is a minor and her date of birth is 01.01.2009. He further submits that the victim in her statement recorded under Section 180 and 183 of BNSS, has supported the prosecution story. 6. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the Applicant has not made out a case for bail. Consequently, the bail application is dismissed. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 24.03.2026 Nitesh/