1 2026:CGHC:6678 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 756 of 2026 1. Smt. Vrinda Sahu W/o Late Shri Kamlesh Sahu Aged About 36 Years Occupation- A.S.I. (M), At Office Of Superintendent Of Police, Sakti, R/o Ward No.- 18, Baradwar- Sakrelibhata, P.S. Baradwar- Distt- Sakti C.G. 2. Shri Shubham Lasar S/o Late Shri Phoolchand Lasar Aged About 26 Years Occupation- Constable (M) At The Office Of Superintendent Of Police, Sakti, R/o Ward No. -2, Naila Bhatapara, P.S. Naila, Distt- Janjgir-Champa C.G. 3. Shri Pushpendra Singh Raj S/o Late Shri Ashok Singh Raj Aged About 23 Years Occupation- Constable (M) At The Office Of Superintendent Of Police, Sakti, R/o Ward No. 9, Aadivasi Colony, Village Jarve, P.S. Janjgir-Champa C.G. ... Petitioners versus 1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through The Additional Chief Secretary Home Affairs, Police Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, District Nava Raipur C.G. 2. The State Of Chhattisgarh The Secretary, Home Affairs, Police Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, District Nava Raipur C.G. 3. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Finance Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, District Raipur C.G. 4. The Director General Of Police, Head Quarter, Atal Nagar District Raipur C.G. ... Respondents SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Date: 2026.02.07 12:06:38 +0530 2 For Petitioners : Mr. Rajesh Roshan Singh, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Mr. Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 05/02/2026 1. Learned counsel for petitioners would submit that petitioner No.1 is appointed on the post of Assistant Sub Inspector (M) and petitioners No.2 and 3 are appointed on the post of Constable (Ministerial) pursuant to the order passed by the office of Police Head Quarter, Raipur Chhattisgarh. Their grievance is that despite order passed by this Court in WP No.4563/2006 and the order passed by Division Bench on 23.02.2011 in WA No.426/2011, against which, Hon’ble Supreme Court has dismissed SLP (Civil)-13274 of 2013, the benefits made admissible to the similarly placed persons vide order dated 03.12.2013 issued by Home Department have not been extended to the petitioners. He would submit that the Director General of Police has already issued a communication for extending similar benefits to all similarly placed persons, but yet necessary orders have not been passed. 2. Learned State counsel would submit that in the event petitioners submit fresh representation before the competent authority, their case shall be scrutinized and if after due 3 verification, it is found that their case is similar, appropriate orders will be passed. 3. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction that in the event petitioners submit fresh representation before the competent authority claiming similar relief as has been extended to the similarly situated employees in whose favour order dated 03.12.2013 has been passed, the competent authority shall scrutinize the case of petitioners and if on verification, it is found that the petitioners are identically placed, necessary orders in this regard be passed in accordance with law within further period of two months. 4. If any adverse order is passed against the petitioners, they would be at liberty to take recourse to law. 5. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge roshan/-