Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24959 (CHH)

VIKAS KUMAR RATHIYA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/7922/2022 · 2026-07-05

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010364942022 2026:CGHC:27783 NAFR HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7922 of 2022 Vikas Kumar Rathiya S/o Kamleshwar Rathiya Aged About 24 Years R/o Village - Bairagi, Post - Bairagi Tahsil - Dhamramjaigarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.). ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Forest Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Nawa Raipur (C.G.). 2 - The Managing Director District Forest Produce Cooperative Union Limited, Dharamhaigarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.). 3 - The Deputy Divisional Forest officer Lailung, District - Raigarh (C.G.). 4 - The Chairman / Present Primary Forest Produce Cooperative Society Limited, Kumarta, District - Raigarh (C.G.). 5 - Amresh Singh S/o Janak Singh R/o Village - Salka, Post Kumarta, District - Raigarh (C.G.). ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Ajeet Kumar Yadav, Advocate For State : Ms. Veethika Choubey, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 06/07/2026 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 would submit that since the order of appointment in favour of respondent No. 5 was issued by the President/Chairman of the Primary Forest Produce Cooperative Society, Kumarta, District Raigarh, the present writ petition is not maintainable, as no writ Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE 2 ordinarily lies against a cooperative society. She would further submit that the petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy to approach the competent authority under Section 55(2) of the Chhattisgarh Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. 2. At this stage, Mr. Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner would seek permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail the alternative remedy available under law. 3. Permission granted. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdraw with the liberty as prayed. Sd/- Rakesh Mohan Pandey JUDGE Nadim