Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24956 (CHH)

LAKSHYADHAR RAJBONGSHI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRCA/1023/2026 · 2026-07-05

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010253652026 2026:CGHC:27739 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRCA No. 1023 of 2026 Lakshyadhar Rajbongshi S/o Shri Bishnuram Rajbongshi Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Barkuriha, P.O. Titkuri, P.S. Kamalpur, District Kamrup, Assam. Pin-781354 ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Officer-In-Charge, Civil Lines Police Station Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. P.N. Goswami, learned Senior Advocate, appeared through Video Conferencing, assisted by Mr. Aayush Bhatia, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Priyank Rathi, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 06.07.2026 1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 232/2026 registered at Police Station – Civil Lines Police Station, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) under Sections 352, 353(1), 353(2) and VAIBHAV SINGH Digitally signed by VAIBHAV SINGH Date: 2026.07.07 17:38:30 +0530 2 Section 66 of the (I.T. Amendment Act, 2008) 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant had earlier filed CRMP No. 1560 of 2026 seeking quashment of the FIR. During the pendency of the said petition, interim relief was granted by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court on the statement made by Mr. Vivek Sharma, learned Advocate General for the State. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present bail application. 3. In view of the above, the present MCRC is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh, if any occasion arises. - Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice vaibhav