Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA
Ex. Pet. No. 1892/2026
Decided on: 28.09.2026 Pushpa Devi
…Petitioner
Versus
H.P. State Forest Corporation & Anr. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner: Mr. Pankaj Sawant, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Kumar Kaustubh, Advocate.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
Following order was passed in the matter on 03.09.2026: -
“Notice. Ms. Kumar Kaustubh, learned counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
Petitioner’s grievance is that though the respondents have issued consideration order on 09.09.2025 pursuant to the decision rendered on 17.07.2025 in CWP No.11434 of 2025, however, till date, neither the pay fixation of the petitioner has been carried out pursuant to the above consideration order nor the consequential benefits flowing in terms of the aforesaid consideration order have been released to her.
If that is so, the respondents are directed to file compliance affidavit/reply alongwith the pay fixation order and the detail of consequential benefits admissible & released to the petitioner, within two weeks. This shall be subject to costs of Rs.2500/- to be paid to the petitioner on the next date, in case consequential action upon consideration order dated 09.09.2025 has not been
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
2 taken by the respondents till date, thereby compelling her to institute this execution petition.
List after two weeks.”
2.
Pursuant to the above, learned counsel for the respondent has placed on record office order dated 12.06.2026, deciding the case of the petitioner and fixing her revised pay scale.
3.
Taking note of the above, the present petition stands
disposed of, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of her surviving grievance, if any, in accordance with law. Also taking note of the fact that the aforesaid
order had been issued by the respondents prior to the imposition of cost upon them vide order dated 03.09.2026, the cost imposed upon the said order is waived off. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge 28th September, 2026(rohit)