Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24951 (CHH)

AMITENDRA NATH DUBEY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/5481/2022 · 2026-07-05

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010397982022 2026:CGHC:27839 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5481 of 2022 1 - Amitendra Nath Dubey S/o Shri Vijendra Nath Dubey Aged About 30 Years 2 - Arun Swami S/o Late Rang Nath Swami Aged About 64 Years 3 - Priayranjan Pandey S/o Shri Ram Bachan Pandey Aged About 46 Years. All R/o Rohinipuram Colony, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Commissioner Raipur Division, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Naib Tahsildar Tahsil Navapara, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Smt. Nirmala Bai D/o Late Shri Vinayak Rao Aged About 61 Years Rajim, P. S. Rajim, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh 5 - Smt. Usha Kiran S/o Vinayak Rao 6 - Smt. Kamla Bai W/o Vinayak Rao 7 - Rajesh Kumar S/o Vinayak Rao Respondent Nos. 5 to 7 are R/o Village Rajim, Tahsil Rajim, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh 8 - Smt. Vaishali D/o Vinayak Rao R/o Quarter No. 8/79/5 Difference Project Amba Jhari Nagpur (M. H.) 9 - Smt. Shakuntala D/o Vinayak Rao R/o Near Chandak Building Public School Nagpur (M. H.) 10 - Pushplata Joshi D/o Vinayak Rao R/o Village Dhawalpur, Gariyaband Chhattisgarh 11 - Smt. Chandrakala D/o Vinayak Rao R/o Handipara Tahsil And District Raipur AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2026.07.07 11:26:48 +0530 2 12 - Shri Laxmi Narayan Mandir Kuhkuha Through Manager Smt. Kamla Bai R/o Tahsil Rajim Gariyaband Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None. For Respondent(s) : Shri Anand Dadariya, Dy AG. SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 06/07/2026 1. None for the petitioner in the first round. Even in the second round, no one appears for the petitioner. 2. In the circumstances, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this Writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Avinash