Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:26348 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P(S). No. 6082 of 2026
---- Rafeya Firdous, aged about 34 Years, D/O- Firoz Ansari, Resident of Kandari More, P.O. & P.S.-Mandar, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand.
.......Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand,
2. The Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, At- Project Building, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand.
3. The Director, Secondary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, At- Project Building, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand.
4. The Director, Primary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, At- Project Building, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand.
5. Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, through its Chairman, having its office at Chaibagan Gali, Kali Nagar, Namkum, P.O. & P.S.- Namkum, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand.
6. The Examination Controller, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, having its office at Chaibagan Gali, Kali Nagar, Namkum, P.O. & P.S.- Namkum, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand.
.....Respondent(s)
---
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--- For the Petitioners : Mr. Shubham Mishra, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Sanjay Piprawall, Advocate
: Mr. Prince Kumar, Advocate
: Mr. Jay Prakash, Advocate
--- 02/ Dated: 29.08.2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner(s) praying therein for the following reliefs: i. For a direction upon the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioner on the post of Assistant Teacher for Class VI-VIII for the subject of Language in Non-para seats under EBC-I
( 2026:JHHC:26348 )
category pursuant to Jharkhand Trained Primary Teacher Combined Competitive Examination 2023 by allowing the petitioner to undergo through the process of document verification as the petitioner despite having been called for document verification, could not appear on the scheduled date due to unavoidable circumstances. ii. Further for a direction upon the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioner for appointment after document verification as the petitioner has scored significantly higher marks than the last selected candidates in his category, as there are still seats are vacant & recruitment process is under process. iii. Further for a direction upon the respondents to consider and act upon the representation submitted by the petitioner for granting him another opportunity to undergo through the process of document verification within a stipulated period, as the petitioner still has not been called for document verification despite his representation.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the petitioner is fully entitled for the prayer made in the instant writ application; as such, he submits that this case may be disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to file fresh representation before the concerned respondent for redressal of her grievance.
4.
Learned counsel for the respondents fairly submits that since no counter affidavit has been filed; as such the petitioner(s) may approach the 6th respondent for redressal of her grievance.
5. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions and looking to the prayer made in the instant writ application, the same is hereby disposed of by directing the petitioner to approach the 6th respondent by filing a fresh representation along with all relevant documents. The moment the 6th respondent receives the representation of petitioner then he will verify the record of the case and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law and applicable rules and regulations within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of such representation.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) 29.08.2026 Abha/-