APHC010528392022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 32238/2022 Between: 1. S. RAVINDRANAYAK,, S/O. T. RAMAPPA, AGE 48 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. MANGAPURAMU VILLAGE, PENUKONDAMANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, SRI SATYA SAI, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 3. THE SUBCOLLECTOR AND SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRAE, PENUKONDA, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, PENUKONDA MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 5. S SREENIVASULU NAYAK, S/O. T. RAMAPPA, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. MANGAPURAMU VILLAGE, PENUKONDAMANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the orders vide Rc.No.596/2018/B, dt.13.06.2022 passed by the 3rd respondent is contrary to the A.P. Rights in Lands Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 as illegal and arbitrary and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents no.2 to 4 not to dispossess the petitioner from the land in Sy.No.699-3 to an extent of Ac.3-36 cents and land in 2 Sy.No.984-1 to an extent of Ac.2-90 cents situated at Penukonda Village, PenukondaMandal, Sri Satya Sai District and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay the operation of orders vide Rc.No.596/2018/B, dt.13.06.2022 passed by the 3rd respondent, pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KATA SAMBASIVA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. P NARAHARI BABU The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard Sri Kata Sambasiva Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 4 and Sri P.Narahari Babu, learned counsel for the respondent No.5. 2. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that, as against the impugned order, the revision petition has also been filed before the respondent No.2. 3. This Court, while issuing notice before admission granted Status-Quo as on 29.09.2022. 4. In that regard, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent No.2 for expeditious disposal of the revision petition. 3 5. Having regard to the same, the respondent No.2 is directed to dispose of the revision petition filed by the petitioner herein as expeditiously as possible not later than three (3) months from the date of receipt of the order.Pending disposal of the said revision petition by the respondent No.2, the interim order granted by this Court on 29.09.2022 shall be in operation. 6. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 23.03.2026 ANI 4 91 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO:32238 of 2022 Dated: 23.03.2026 ANI