G. APPA RAO, CHITTOOR DT. v. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER,(OPERATIONS), TIRUPATI & ANR
WP/38656/2012 · 2026-03-02
Ninala Jayasurya
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24942 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24942 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010523342012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 38656/2012 Between:
1. G. APPA RAO, CHITTOOR DT., S/O G.GANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O D.NO.13-6-600/44/157-B, P.K.LAYOUT, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER OPERATIONS TIRUPATI ANR, A.P.S.P.D.C.L, TIRUPATI.
2. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER OPERATIONS, A.P.S.P.D.C.L, OPERATION CIRCLE, P.K.LAYOUT, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of writ of Manamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not giving electricity connection to the premises D.No.13-6-600/44/157-B, P.K.Layout, Tirupati belonging to the petitioner, inspite of sanction of the 15` respondent vide letter
2
NJS,J
W.P.NO.38656 OF 2012 No.SE/0/TPT/AEComml./F.No.27/D.No.1067/12 dated 2.5.2012, approval under regulation 43(3) vide letter No.E.1/KN/TECH/HV/D.No.1284/2012 dated 23.5.2012 and installation of the transformer etc., as illegal, arbitrary, improper and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, and consequently to direct the respondents to give electricity connection to the premises D.No.13-6-600/44/157-B, P.K.Layout, Tirupati belonging to the petitioner, in the interest of justice, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 49037 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to forthwith give connection of electricity supply to the premises D. No.13-6-600/44/157-B, P.K.Layout, Tirupati belonging to the petitioner, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. N BHARAT BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL The Court made the following:
3
NJS,J
W.P.NO.38656 OF 2012
ORDER:
Ms.P.Sai Bharathi,
learned counsel representing Mr.N.Bharat Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that, in view of the subsequent developments in the writ petition, the cause does not survive for adjudication.
2. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA 03.03.2026
LSP