Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24940 (PNJ)

JAYATI ARYA v. CANARA BANK AND ORS

CWP/19518/2026 · 2026-06-30

Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

109 JAYATI ARYA CANARA BANK AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1. dated 02.05.2026 (Annexure P from Gwalior Regional Office, Regional Office, Chennai Circle Office. 2. Court as to how this Court has the jurisdiction to keeping in view the aforesaid situation as the impugned order was passed outside the jurisdiction of this Co that the present petition may kindly be disposed of as not pressed any further with liberty to approach the appropriate 3. 30-06-2026 Sapna Goyal IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision : I ARYA VERSUS CANARA BANK AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN Mr. Shantanu Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate for the respondent (joined through V.C.). HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) In the present civil writ petition, challenge is to the transfer order dated 02.05.2026 (Annexure P-7) whereby, the petitioner has been transferred from Gwalior Regional Office, Bhopal Circle Office to Chennai Regional Office, Chennai Circle Office. Learned counsel for the petitioner was requested to address this Court as to how this Court has the jurisdiction to keeping in view the aforesaid situation as the impugned order was passed outside the jurisdiction of this Court, learned counsel for that the present petition may kindly be disposed of as not pressed any further with liberty to approach the appropriate Court Ordered accordingly. 2026 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SE NOTE: Whether speaking/ reasoned: YES Whether reportable: NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19518-2026 Date of Decision : 30.06.2026 ........Petitioner VERSUS ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Mr. Shantanu Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate for the respondent-Bank. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) petition, challenge is to the transfer order 7) whereby, the petitioner has been transferred Bhopal Circle Office to Chennai North the petitioner was requested to address this Court as to how this Court has the jurisdiction to consider the present petition keeping in view the aforesaid situation as the impugned order was passed learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition may kindly be disposed of as not pressed any further Court having the requisite jurisdiction. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/ reasoned: YES Whether reportable: NO SINGH SETHI petition, challenge is to the transfer order 7) whereby, the petitioner has been transferred North the petitioner was requested to address this the present petition keeping in view the aforesaid situation as the impugned order was passed the petitioner submits that the present petition may kindly be disposed of as not pressed any further having the requisite jurisdiction. THI) SAPNA GOYAL 2026.06.30 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document