Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2494 (JHR)

ARASTUS EKKA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY

WPC/836/2026 · 2026-02-10

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(2026:JHHC:3603) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S). No. 836 of 2026 Arastus Ekka, aged about 57 years, son of late Stepan Ekka, resident of Shamlong, Bharat Coaching Centre, Shamlong, PO - Shamlong, PS -Namkom, District - Ranchi. … … Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary, Project Bhawa, P.O. & P.S. - Dhurwa, District - Ranchi. 2. Secretary, Transport Department, Government of Jharkhand, F.F.P. Building Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. - Dhurwa, District - Ranchi. 3. Under Secretary, Transport Department, Government of Jharkhand, F.F.P. Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. - Dhurwa, District - Ranchi. … … Respondent --- CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. --- For the Petitioner : Mr. A. K. Sahani, Advocate For the Resp.-State : Mr. Ruchi Mukti, AC to AAG --- 02/10th February, 2026 1. It is grievance of the petitioner that 3rd MACP which the petitioner is entitled to w.e.f. 10.01.2024, has not been paid to him. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that all the documents have already been submitted but the respondents are not taking any decision. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that if the petitioner files a fresh representation before the respondent no. 2, Secretary, Transport Department, Government of Jharkhand, his case will be considered and an appropriate order will be passed. 4. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the respondents, I direct the petitioner to file a fresh representation mentioning his grievance before the respondent no. 2, Secretary, Transport Department, Government of Jharkhand within a period of four weeks. 5. On receipt of such representation, the respondent no. 2, Secretary, Transport Department, Government of Jharkhand, will consider the representation of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order within a period of six weeks thereafter. (2026:JHHC:3603) 2 6. If the petitioner is found entitled, appropriate order be passed by the respondents within a period of four weeks thereafter. 7. If any part of the claim is turned down, the reason thereof should be communicated to the petitioner within the aforesaid period. 8. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is disposed off. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Aditi Uploaded on:-13.02.2026