Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24937 (PNJ)

MAKSOOD v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/34566/2026 · 2026-06-30

Virinder Aggarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-34566-2026 (O&M) CRM-M-34638-2026 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (205) CRM-M-34566-2026 (O&M) CRM-M-34638-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:-30.06.2026 1. CRM-M-34566-2026 (O&M) MAKSOOD … Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent 2. CRM-M-34638-2026 (O&M) MAKSOOD … Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner in both cases. Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Advocate for the complainant in both cases. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG, Haryana. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) 1. Status reports dated 27.06.2026 in both petitions have been filed which are taken on record. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he intends to withdraw the instant petitions with liberty to file the petitions subsequently, if required on ground of change of circumstances. 3. In view of this, the instant petitions CRM-M-34566-2026 and CRM-M-34638-2026 are dismissed as withdrawn. POONAM 2026.06.30 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-34566-2026 (O&M) CRM-M-34638-2026 (O&M) 4. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. 5 A photocopy of this order be also placed on the file of the connected case. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 30th June, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No POONAM 2026.06.30 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document