Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24935 (CHH)

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, v. SMT. AMRITA @ RANI DHRUW

MCC/604/2026 · 2026-07-05

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010242002026 2026:CGHC:27649 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 604 of 2026 1 - The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Through The Branch Manager, Rama Trade Center, In Front Of Rajeev Plaza, Near Bus Stand, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) (Insurer Of Offending Vehicle Registration Mazda No. C.G.-10-A-4210), ... Applicant versus 1 - Smt. Amrita @ Rani Dhruw W/o Late Bhratlal Dhruw Aged About 19 Years Now 26 Years R/o Village- Nevra, Ajaypur, Police Station - Kota, Tehsil- Takhatpur, District- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), (Claimant) 2 - Smt. Bhagmati Dhruw W/o Banshilal Dhruw Aged About 55 Years Now 61 Years R/o Village- Nevra, Ajaypur, Police Station - Kota, Tehsil- Takhatpur, District- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), 3 - Banshilal Dhruw S/o Late Budhram Dhruw Aged About 57 Years Now 63 Years R/o Village- Nevra, Ajaypur, Police Station - Kota, Tehsil- Takhatpur, District- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), 4 - Laxmi Prasad Jaiswal S/o Ramkumar Jaiswal Aged About 32 Years Now 38 Years Occupation- Driver, Resident Of Kota, Tahsil And Police Station - Kota, District- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) (Driver Of Offending Vehicle Registration Mazda No. C.G.-10-A-4210), 2 5 - Ashok Singh S/o Itwar Singh R/o Kargikhurd, Kota, Tahsil And Police Station- Kota, District- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) (Owner Of Offending Vehicle Registration Mazda No. C.G.-10-A-4210), ... Respondent(s) For Applicant : Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 3 : Mr. Avinash Chand Sahu, Advocate SB - Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 06.07.2026 1. The present MCC has been filed for correction of a typographical error in judgment dated 28/04/2026 passed by this Court in MAC/1180/2020 (Annexure A-1). 2. Inadvertently, in paragraph 6 of the award, the total compensation awarded by this Court has been mentioned as Rs. 20,34,792/-, however, it ought to be Rs. 19,02,792/- and as a result, in paragraph 7 of the award, the compensation enhanced by this Court has been mentioned as Rs. 6,95,192/- whereas it would come to Rs. 5,63,192/-. 3. Thus, the total compensation awarded by this Court, as mentioned in paragraph 6 of the award, be read as Rs. 19,02,792/- and the additional amount enhanced by this 3 Court, as mentioned in paragraph 7 of the award, be read as Rs. 5,63,192/-. The rest of the impugned award as passed by this Court shall remain intact. 4. Accordingly, the instant MCC is allowed and the impugned award is modified to the extent indicated herein-above. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Harneet