[2026:JHHC:26435 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8188 of 2026 ------ Rahul Singh @ Pankaj Kumar Singh, aged about 27 years, Son of Opin Singh @ Mohit Prasad Singh, Resident of Village-Behrakudar, P.O. & P.S. Barora, District- Dhanbad. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Lukesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pathak, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-02-09-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Topchanchi P.S. Case No.75 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 132, 121(1), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in demanding extortion from the Hotel Manager of a Hotel and when police reached the place of occurrence and arrested the petitioner and co-accused Satyam Kumar Tiwari @ Satyam Kumar Tewary, he attempted to flee away and the co-accused persons manhandled the informant- Police Officer deterring him from discharge his duty and tried to snatch away his service revolver but by the time, more police force arrived at the place of occurrence and the petitioner could not escape and apprehended along with the co-accused person. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 20.07.2026 as mentioned in para-13 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the co-accused person of this case has been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 25.08.2026 in B.A. No. 7963 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Dhanbad in connection with Topchanchi P.S. Case No. 75 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 02/09/2026 Amar/