APHC010523302024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26922/2024 Between: 1. ABDUL MALIK, S/O SYED MOHIDDIN, GPA HOLDER OF SY.NO. 173/2B, VIDYA NAGAR, KUMOOL AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS R/O, PLOT NO, 106, NAGA SAI NAGAR, OPP. RAMANNA GUEST HOUSE, KALLUR, KURNOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH- 518003 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELUGAPUDI ,AMARAVATHI 2. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, SECRETARIAT, VELUGAPUDI ,AMARAVATHI 3. THE COMMISSIONER, KURNOOL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, 4TH TOWN PS, KURNOOL TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT 6. SYED MOHAMMED PEER, S/O LATE S. FAKKIR AHAMED AGED. 63, R/O H.NO 44/35A, ROJASTREET, KUMOOL DISTRICT. 7. S MOHAMMED AZAM, S/O LATE S. FAKKIR AHAMED AGED. 59, H.NO. 11-116, OSMANIYA COLLEGE ROAD, KURNOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH- 518001 8. S LATEEF BEE, W/O LATE S. NAZIR AHAMED AGED. 75 YEARS, H.NO. 11-116, OSMANIYA COLLEGE ROAD, KURNOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH- 518001 9. K MOHAMMAD SHAZADI BEE, D/O LATE S. FAKKIR AHAMED AGED 50 YEARS, H.NO 5/ 136, GAFFAR STREET KURNOOL DISTRICT AND CITY 10. SHAIK PYARI BEE, W/O MASOOD ALI KHAN AGED 59 YEARS, H.NO. 1-5-86, LINGAMAYYA ST. ALLAGADDA TOWN, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 11. SHAIK RAMEEZ BEE, W/O LATE ABDUL LATEEF, AGED 63 YEARS, H.NO. 11-116, OSMANIYA COLLEGE ROAD, KURNOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH- 518001 12. SYED NOORZAHAN, D/O SYED RAZAK PEER AGED 64, H.NO. 11- 116, OSMANIYA COLLEGE ROAD, KURNOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH- 518001 13. S RAMASWAMY, S/O MALLIKARJUNA AGE 53, H.NO 40-807-EL, NEHRU NAGAR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 14. SOMU KRISHNA MURTHY, S/O S. VENUGOPAL AGED 65, H.NO. 18/100A-34, SHAROFF BAZAR, OLD BUSSTAND, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 15. S HARIRADHA, W/OSOMU KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED 59, H.NO. 18/100A-34, SHAROFF BAZAR, OLD BUSSTAND, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 16. BILAKANTI RAVI KUMAR, S/O BILAKANTI NAGI SETTY, H.NO. 18- 100A-15, SHAROFF BAZAR, OLD BUSSTAND, KURNOOL CITY, KURNOOL DIST. 17. B VENKATA RAMANA, S/O BILAKANTI NAGI SETTY, H.NO. 40/808- F-LL, SREENIVASA NAGAR, KURNOOL CITY, KURNOOL DIST. 18. JAYANTI NARASIMHAIAH, S/O J. BALASWAMY AGED 65, H.NO. 45/153, PRAKASH NAGAR KURNOOL CITY, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 19. J SREERAMULU, S/O J. BALASWAMY AGED 61, H.NO. 18/LOOA - 15, SHAROFF BAZAR, OLD BUSTAND, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 20. CHILUKURU BHASKAR, S/O C. KRISHNA MURTHY AGED 55 YEARS, H.NO. 40-808-F7-1, SREENIVASA NAGAR NEAR BSNL OFFICE, KUMOOL 21. CHILUKURU CHINNI PAPAIAH, S/O CHILUKURU BHASKAR AGED 31 YEARS, H.NO. 40-808-F7-1, SREENIVASA NAGAR NEAR BSNL OFFICE, KURNOOL 22. PUNYAMURTHY RAMAIAH, S/O P. SUBRAMANYEM, H.NO. 18/100A-19, SHAROOF BAZAR, OLD BUS-STAND, KURNOOL CITY. 23. P UDAYKIRAN, S/O P. RAMAIAH H.NO. 18/100A-19, SHAROOF BAZAR, OLD BUS-STAND, KUMOOL DISTRICT. 24. P GOPI KISHORE, S/O P. GOPAL RAO AGED 48, H.NO. 45/88-302, ADITYA ENCLAVE, N.R. NAGAR, KURNOOL DISTRICT 25. P JYOTHI, W/O P.GOPI KISHORE AGED 41, H.NO. 45/88-302, ADITYA ENCLAVE, N.R. NAGAR, KUMOOL DISTRICT. 26. RAVIKANTAKANCHANAM, S/O K.C. BOJANNA AGE 50 H.NO 40- 814-1/SREENIVASA NAGAR, NEAR BSNL OFFICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction declaring the action of Respondents, particularly 3 and SRespondent herein, as arbitrary, illegal, unwarranted, unconstitutional and against the principles of Natural Justiceand violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct,the Respondents No.5, herein not to interfere with the suit land, pending civil dispute and pending disposal of the Writ Petition before this Honble Court and the Respondents No.3, herein not to grant permission for construction of any buildings in the above mentioned property, unless an application is made by the Petitioners, pending civil dispute and pending disposal of the Writ Petition before this Honble Courtand pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondents, more particularly the Respondents No.5, herein not to interfere with the suit land, pending civil dispute and pending disposal of the Writ Petition before this Honble Court pending civil dispute and IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondents, more particularly the Respondents No.3, herein not to grant permission for construction of any buildings in the above mentioned property, unless an application is made by the Petitioners, pending civil dispute and Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. LAKSHMIKANTH REDDY DESAI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26922/2024 ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…declaring the action of Respondents, particularly 3rd Respondent herein, as arbitrary, illegal, unwarranted, unconstitutional and against the principles of Natural Justice and violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct, the Respondents No.5, herein not to interfere with the suit land, pending civil dispute and pending disposal of the Writ Petition before this Honble Court and the Respondents No.3, herein not to grant permission for construction of any buildings in the above mentioned property, unless an application is made by the Petitioners, pending civil dispute and pending disposal of the Writ Petition before this Honble Court and pass…” 2. None represented on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the 5th respondent police have not received any complaint with regard to the civil disputes. He would further submit that none of the parties were summoned to the police station and that no one was pressurized to settle the civil dispute between the parties. As the matter is purely civil in nature, the respondent police have never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties 4. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 02.01.2026 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26922/2024 Dated. 02.01.2026 KKV 202 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO: WRIT PETITION NO: 26922/2024 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 2. 02.01.2026 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (Vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP, J KKV