Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24901 (CAL)

UTPAL MARDI v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/500/2026 · 2026-06-23

Tirthankar Ghosh

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

23.06.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 14. Kausik (Rejected) CRM (M) 500 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Patiram Police Station Case No. 68 of 2025 dated 22.03.2025 under Sections 140(3)/137(2) of the BNS, 2023 read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act. And In the matter of : Utpal Mardi ……Petitioner. Mr. Koushik Chowdhury Mr. Dwaipayan Panda Mr. Tridib Das ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Sagar Saha Ms. Nayana Mukhopadhyay ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner as well as the State submits that till date the evidence of the victim is not over, although charges have been framed. Having considered the same, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail till the evidence of the victim is over. Learned Special Court is directed to give priority to the evidence of the victim preferably to be completed within a period of 60 days from the next date fixed. At this stage, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in CRM (M) 500 of 2026 is dismissed. 2 All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)