Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24900 (CAL)

TIMIR BARAN HATAI v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/23367/2025 · 2026-06-23

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2. 2. (D/L) (D/L) 13.05.2026 CT. NO. 05 (ARPAN-A.R.CT.) In The High Court at Calcutta CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 23367 OF 2025 WITH CAN 1 OF 2026 TIMIR BARAN HATAI VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS …………… Mr. Subhojit Seal, Adv. Mr. Soumya Khan, Adv. Ms. Sneha Dutta, Adv. …for the Petitioner Mr. Anirban Mitra, Adv. Mr. Amit Halder, Adv. Mrs. Madhumita Sadhukhan, Adv. …for the Respondent Nos.5 & 6 Mr. Iftekar Munshi, Adv. (Via VC) …for the Respondent Nos.7-9 1. Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. 2. At the time of call petitioner and respondent nos.5, 6 & 7-9 are represented by learned advocates. 3. However, State respondents are not represented. 4. Order passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench dated 3rd December, 2025 on an intra-court appeal being MAT 1855 of 2025 (Uttar Kolkata Sanhati Sporting Club vs. Timir Baran Hatai and Others) is placed before this Court and same is taken on record. 5. In terms of paragraph 26 of the order of Hon’ble Division Bench dated 3rd December, 2025, parties are required to file affidavits before hearing of the writ petition. 6. Let affidavit-in-opposition to this writ petition be filed by 22nd May, 2026 and affidavit-in-reply, thereto if any, be filed by one (1) week after the ensuing Summer Vacation. [2] 7. State respondents shall also be at liberty to file affidavit- in-opposition within the aforesaid time. 8. List the matter under the heading “For Orders” on 23rd June, 2026 at the top. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)