2026:JHHC:6048 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 2859 of 2015 …… Avinash Tripathi son of Sri Kamlakar Tripathi, resident of B2/161, D-1A, Bhadaini, P.O. Shivala, P.S. Bhelpur, District Varanasi (U.P.). …. Petitioner(s) -VERSUS- 1. The State of Jharkhand through Principal Secretary Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of Jharkhand, Nepal House, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi. 2.The Registrar, Nilambar-Pitambar University, Daltonganj, P.O. and P.S. Daltonganj, District Palamau. 3. The President, D.A.V. College Managing Committee, Chitra Gupta Road, New Delhi-110 055. 4. The General Secretary, D.A.V. College Managing Committee, Chitra Gupta Road, New Delhi-110 055. 5. The Director (Colleges), D.A.V. College Managing Committee, Chitra Gupta Road, New Delhi-110 055. 6. The Regional Director, DAV Public School, Robertsganj Zone, C/o DAV Public School, Peepari Road, P.O. & P.S. Robertsganj, Sonebhadra, Uttar Pradesh. 7.The Principal, D.A.V. Institute of Engineering & Technology, Daltonganj, P.O. and P.S. Daltonganj, District, Palamau. 8. The Jharkhand University of Technology, through its Registrar, Namkum, P.O. & P.S. Namkum, District-Ranchi. …..Respondent (s) …… CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv For the Respondent (s) : Mr. Divyam, A.C. to S.C.-IV For the University : Dr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Adv Mr. Sharan Toppo, Adv …… 10/25.02.2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying therein for quashing of letter dated 20.04.2015 as contained in Ref. No. DAVIET/AO/MISC/2015-16/99, issued under the signature 2026:JHHC:6048 2 of the respondent no.7, whereby and whereunder, it has been informed that services of the petitioner are no longer required in the institution with immediate effect. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner fairly submits that at the time of filing of the writ application, the Jharkhand Education Tribunal was not functioning. However, now it is fully functional. As such, this application may be disposed of by giving liberty to the Petitioner to approach the concerned tribunal. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the grievance of the petitioner is against the respondent nos. 3 to 7, which is the Management of the respondent institute. 5. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Jharkhand Education Tribunal, which shall decide the issue in accordance with law. 6. Pending I.A, if any, also stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J) 25.02.2026 Amardeep/ Uploaded 11.03.2026