Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 249 (ALL)

VEENA SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/10289/2026 · 2026-03-18

Atul Sreedharan, Siddharth Nandan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 10289 of 2026 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE ATUL SREEDHARAN, J. HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Shashi Dhar Sahai, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 & 3. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that on account of information received from the Coimbatore Police with regard to an online fraud of Rs.10,000/- which has been deposited with the account of the petitioner, the account of the petitioner has been frozen. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not aware as to how the said offending amount was deposited in his account. 4. Under the circumstances, this petition is disposed of by directing the respondent Bank to take down the amount of Rs.10,000/- from the account of the petitioner into Escrow Account of the Bank and thereafter unfreeze the account of the petitioner so that she may withdraw her amount, to which petitioner has no objection. 5. It will be responsibility of the Bank to refund the amount to the actual owner from whose account the said amount was taken and deposited in the account of the petitioner. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. March 19, 2026 R.S. Tiwari Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar Srivastava, Rajesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Anadi Krishna Narayana, Shashi Dhar Sahai, Vivek Tripathi (Siddharth Nandan,J.) (Atul Sreedharan,J.) Veena Singh .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad